Economic evaluation of temsirolimus on the basis of the results of the ARCC (Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma) study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7175/fe.v10i2.167Keywords:
Metastatic renal cell carcinoma, Temsirolimus, Interferon alfa, Cost-effectivenessAbstract
Introduction: metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) is highly resistant to chemotherapeutics, rendering limited antitumor effect. Temsirolimus, a specific inhibitor of the mammalian target of rapamycin kinase, may benefit patients with this disease. The Global ARCC Trial (Temsirolimus, Interferon Alfa, or Both for Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma) compared temsirolimus alone or temsirolimus plus interferon alfa with interferon alfa alone in mRCC. It has demonstrated that, as compared with interferon alfa, temsirolimus improved overall survival among patients with metastatic renal-cell carcinoma and a poor prognosis while the addition of temsirolimus to interferon did not improve survival. Aim: the objective of our study was to investigate the pharmacoeconomic impact in the Italian context of temsirolimus vs interferon alfa in patients with metastatic renal-cell carcinoma and a poor prognosis. Methods: economic evaluation is based on clinical outcome data from the ARCC trial and was carried out conducting a cost/effectiveness analysis, comparing economic and clinical consequences of temsirolimus (25 mg weekly) vs interferon alfa (18 MU 3 times weekly) in the perspective of the Italian National Health Service. Direct medical costs included in the analysis were drug costs, costs associated with the management of treatment-related serious adverse events (grade 3 and 4), cost related to progression and best supportive care. Effects were measured in terms of overall survival. A sensitivity analysis was performed. Results: the cost of temsirolimus or interferon alfa therapy amounted to approximately € 14,000 and € 2,000 patient respectively. The cost of hospitalization related to drug toxicity was about € 1,500 for temsirolimus and € 2,100 for interferon alfa. Temsirolimus shows an incremental cost per patient per month saved of € 3,767. Sensitivity analysis demonstrates that cost consequences parameters are sensitive to fluctuation. Discussion: this study is the first economic evaluation of ARCC trial based on the Italian context. This evaluation found that temsirolimus therapy in patients with metastatic renal-cell carcinoma and a poor prognosis is cost-effective.Downloads
Published
2009-06-15
How to Cite
de Portu, S., Carteni, G., & Belisari, A. (2009). Economic evaluation of temsirolimus on the basis of the results of the ARCC (Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma) study. Farmeconomia. Health Economics and Therapeutic Pathways, 10(2), 93–97. https://doi.org/10.7175/fe.v10i2.167
Issue
Section
Review (Economic Analysis)
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal. The Publication Agreement can be downloaded here, and should be signed by the Authors and sent to the Publisher when the article has been accepted for publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
- Authors are permitted to post their work online after publication (the article must link to publisher version, in html format)