Promuovere il coinvolgimento dei pazienti per migliorare la sicurezza in chirurgia

Autori

  • Ramona Gobbi Sale operatorie, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli di Bologna
  • Patrizio Di Denia Direzione sanitaria, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli di Bologna
  • Maurizia Rolli Direzione sanitaria, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli di Bologna
  • Gerardina Protupapa Struttura Complessa di ortopedia traumatologia e chirurgia protesica e dei reimpianti d’anca e di ginocchio, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli di Bologna
  • Francesco Traina Struttura Complessa di ortopedia traumatologia e chirurgia protesica e dei reimpianti d’anca e di ginocchio, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli di Bologna

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7175/pmeal.v14i1.1483

Parole chiave:

Risk management, Safety surgery, Patient involvement

Abstract

Background: Patient safety has become essential with increasing complexity of health systems and the consequent increase in patient damage. Clinical risk management aims to prevent and reduce the risks, errors and damages that occur to patients during health care. The direct involvement of patients in care pathways can be both an important source of information on potential risks and a resource for improving safety.

Objective: To improve patient safety in surgery by promoting the active involvement of patients admitted to an orthopedic department.

Method: After check-in, a checklist was administered to the patients, consisting of 21 items that took into consideration the good practices to be applied in surgery. The checklists returned by the patients at the end of their stay were analyzed to identify any areas for improvement.

Results: From July 2019 to September 2019, the checklists were administered to 76 patients who underwent hip or knee arthroplasty, admitted to an orthopedic ward. 63% of the delivered checklists were returned by the patients. The analysis made it possible to verify that good practices for safety in surgery are effectively applied by health personnel. However, some critical areas were identified on which to intervene with improvement actions.

Conclusions: This work demonstrates that patient involvement can help improve the safety of the surgical path, in order to prevent potential adverse events. Further studies are needed with sufficient sample power to validate the findings of this work.

Riferimenti bibliografici

Davis RE, Jacklin R, Sevdalis N, et al. Patient involvement in patient safety: what factors influence patient participation and engagement?

Health Expect 2007; 10: 259-67. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1369-7625.2007.00450.x

Schwappach DL. Review: engaging patients as vigilant partners in safety: a systematic review. Med Care Res Rev 2010; 67: 119-

https://doi.org/10.1177/1077558709342254

Ministero del Lavoro, della Salute e delle Politiche Sociali. Manuale per la Sicurezza in sala operatoria: Raccomandazioni e

Checklist, 2009

Novaco F, Damen V. La gestione del rischio clinico (IV° ed.). Torino: Centro Scientifico Editore, 2004

World Health Organization (WHO). Guidelines for safe surgery: safe surgery saves lives. 2009. Disponibile online su https://

www.who.int/patientsafety/safesurgery/tools_resources/9789241598552/en/ (ultimo accesso 22 giugno 2020)

World Health Organization (WHO). Surgical Safety Checklist – SSCL. 2009. Disponibile online su https://www.who.int/patientsafety/

safesurgery/checklist/en (ultimo accesso 22 giugno 2020)

Regione Emilia Romagna. Agenzia sanitaria e sociale regionale. Raccomandazioni per la sicurezza in sala operatoria. 2010. Disponibili

online su https://assr.regione.emilia-romagna.it/pubblicazioni/rapporti-documenti/raccomandazioni-per-la-sicurezzain-

sala-operatoria/@@download/publicationFile/Raccomandazioni_SO.pdf (ultimo accesso 22 giugno 2020)

Shekelle PG, Wachter RM, Pronovost PJ, et al. Making health care safer II: an updated critical analysis of the evidence for patient

safety practices. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep) 2013:1-945

Sheard L, O’Hara J, Armitage G, et al. Evaluating the PRASE patient safety intervention - a multi-centre, cluster trial with a qualitative

process evaluation: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial [published correction appears in Trials. 2016 Dec

;17 (1):605]. Trials 2014; 15: 420. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-420

Lawton R, O’Hara JK, Sheard L, et al. Can patient involvement improve patient safety? A cluster randomised control trial of

the Patient Reporting and Action for a Safe Environment (PRASE) intervention. BMJ Qual Saf 2017; 26: 622-31. https://doi.

org/10.1136/bmjqs-2016-005570

Pubblicato

2020-07-06

Fascicolo

Sezione

Articolo