Il danno da emotrasfusione: dieci sentenze delle Sezioni Unite della Cassazione. II parte

Autori

  • Marianna Pulice Avvocato, Foro di Cosenza

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7175/pmeal.v3i2.365

Parole chiave:

Transfusion of infected blood, Negligence, Legal decisions

Abstract

The first part of this article, published in the 2008; 4(2) issue of this Journal, examined ten judgements of the United Sections of the Court of Cassation concerning negligent transfusion of infected blood, with transmission of hepatitis virus, B or C, or HIV. In this second part, the Author analyses some of these legal decisions with attention to prescription of the judgement, worsening of the infected patient, value of Commissions proceedings, and causal connection.

##submission.downloads##

Pubblicato

2009-05-15

Fascicolo

Sezione

Articolo