Mappatura dei rischi clinici mediante l’integrazione delle fonti informative
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7175/pmeal.v8i3.940Parole chiave:
Patient safety, Clinical risk management, Mapping risk, International Classification Patient Safety (ICPS), Information sourcesAbstract
[Mapping of clinical risks through the integration of information sources]
At the IRCCS Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute in Bologna (Italy) has been active a program of risk management since 2007. It provides integrated and systematic use of tools and sources of information related to the safety of patients, workers and environment and to the management of claims and litigation.
To define priorities for actions included in the «Plan to Safety» and to address appropriately the resources available for the reduction of adverse events, it was developed a mapping of risks through the integration of data from different information sources related to patient safety and obtained at the company level (Incident Reporting, Patient Complaints, Claims).
To classify the events was utilized the International Classification of Patient Safety (ICPS) developed by the World Health Organization (WHO).
It were used 875 reports derived from the three sources of information and they were related to the categories of class «Incident Type» of ICPS. Four categories of accidents were most frequently observed: «Clinical Process/Procedures» (20.0%), «Clinical Administration» (16.8%), «Documentation» (11.3%),«Medication/IV Fluids» (10.2%). For the class «Patient Outcomes» of ICPS were more frequently events with «None» harm (64.6%) and those with «Mild» harm (29.9%).
The classification with the ICPS system has proven to be a useful tool for a preliminary mapping of risks and identify critical areas to be tackled as a priority.
The ICPS introduces a conceptual framework for patient safety with which it is possible to make comparisons of the results of activities related to risk management both locally and at a regional and national level.
Riferimenti bibliografici
Barach P, Small SD. Reporting and preventing medical mishaps: lessons from non-medical near miss reporting systems. BMJ 2000; 320:759-63; http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7237.759
Thomas EJ, Petersen LA. Measuring errors and adverse events in health care. J Gen Intern Med 2003; 18: 61-7; http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20147.x
Sari AB, Sheldon TA, Cracknell A, et al. Sensitivity of routine system for reporting patient safety incidents in an NHS hospital: retrospective patient case note review. BMJ 2007; 334: 79; http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39031.507153.AE
Michel P, Quenon JL, de Sarasqueta AM, et al. Comparison of three methods for estimating rates of adverse events and rates of preventable adverse events in acute care hospitals. BMJ 2004; 328: 199; http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7433.199
Hogan H, Olsen S, Scobie S, et al. What can we learn about patient safety from information sources within an acute hospital: a step on the ladder of integrated risk management? Qual Saf Health Care 2008; 17: 209-15; http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2006.020008
Kessels-Habraken M, Van Der Schaaf T, De Jonge J, et al. Integration of prospective and retrospective methods for risk analysis
in hospitals. Int J Qual Health Care 2009; 21: 427-32; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzp043
Levtzion-Korach O, Frankel A, Alcalai H, et al. Integrating incident data from five reporting systems to assess patient safety: Making
sense of the elephant. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2010; 36: 402-10
Chang A, Schyve PM, Croteau RJ, et al. The JCAHO patient safety event taxonomy: a standardized terminology and classification schema for near misses and adverse events. Int J Qual Health Care 2005; 17: 95-105; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzi021
Trisolini R, La Rovere S, Rodella S. Mappatura dei rischi: identificare i pericoli e valutare i rischi. Monitor 2012; 31: 73-99
Thomson R, Lewalle P, Sherman H, et al; World Alliance For Patient Safety Drafting Group. Towards an International Classification for Patient Safety: the conceptual framework. Int J Qual Health Care 2009; 21: 2-8; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzn054
de Feijter JM, de Grave WS, Muijtjens AM, et al. A comprehensive overview of medical error in hospitals using incident-reporting systems, patient complaints and chart review of inpatient deaths. PLoS ONE 2012; 7: e31125; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031125
Mikkelsen KL, Thommesen J, Andersen HB. Validating the Danish adaptation of the World Health Organization’s International Classification for Patient Safety classification of patient safety incident types. Int J Qual Health Care 2013; 25:132-40; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzs080
World Health Organization. Conceptual Framework for the International Classification for Patient Safety. Version 1.1. Final Technical Report. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2009. Disponibile online su http://www.who.int/patientsafety/implementation/taxonomy/icps_technical_report_en.pdf [ultimo accesso agosto 2014]
##submission.downloads##
Pubblicato
Fascicolo
Sezione
Licenza
Gli autori che pubblicano su questa rivista accettano i seguenti termini:
- Gli autori mantengono il copyright e garantiscono alla rivista il diritto di prima pubblicazione del lavoro, sottoposto a licenza Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0 License, che consente ad altri di condividere il lavoro a patto di riconoscere la paternità dell’opera e la prima pubblicazione in questa rivista.
- Gli autori possono stipulare accordi contrattuali separati e aggiuntivi per la distribuzione non-esclusiva del lavoro nella versione pubblicata dalla rivista (es. archiviarlo in repository istituzionali o pubblicarlo in un libro), a patto che sia riconosciuta la prima pubblicazione in questa rivista. L’accordo di pubblicazione può essere scaricato cliccando qui e deve essere firmato dagli autori e inviato all’Editore al momento dell’accettazione dell’articolo da parte della rivista.
- Gli autori sono autorizzati e incoraggiati a diffondere il lavoro online (es. in repository istituzionali o sul proprio sito), prima e durante il processo di sottomissione, poiché ciò può portare effetti positivi per la visibilità e la diffusione del lavoro, come una maggiore citazione dell’articolo pubblicato (vedi The Effect of Open Access).
- Gli autori sono autorizzati a pubblicare il lavoro online dopo la pubblicazione, tramite link alla versione pubblicata sulla rivista in formato html