[Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Maribavir in Patients with Post-Transplant Cytomegalovirus Infection or Disease that are Refractory or Resistant to Conventional Therapy]

[Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Maribavir in Patients with Post-Transplant Cytomegalovirus Infection or Disease that are Refractory or Resistant to Conventional Therapy]

Authors

  • Andrea Marcellusi Economic Evaluation and HTA (CEIS- EEHTA) - IGF Department, Faculty of Economics, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Italy
  • Chiara Bini Economic Evaluation and HTA (CEIS- EEHTA) - IGF Department, Faculty of Economics, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Italy
  • Simone Corinti Takeda Italia Spa. Rome, Italy
  • Laura Fioravanti Takeda Italia Spa. Rome, Italy
  • Laura Dalla Vedova Takeda Italia Spa. Rome, Italy
  • Stacey L. Amorosi Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc.
  • Tam De Lacey Parexel International, HEOR Modeling, London, UK
  • Emtiyaz Chowdhury Parexel International, HEOR Modeling, London, UK
  • Francesco Saverio Mennini Economic Evaluation and HTA (CEIS- EEHTA) - IGF Department, Faculty of Economics, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, Italy Institute for Leadership and Management in Health - Kingston University London, London, UK

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7175/fe.v24i1.1548

Keywords:

Cytomegalovirus, Maribavir, Cost-effectiveness, Transplant

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection represents a serious post-transplantation complication, particularly among transplant recipients with resistant or refractory (R/R) infection. Despite the improvement made in CMV prevention and treatment, remains a need for new therapies that are better tolerated and safer for patients, especially for refractory or resistant (R/R) infections. This analysis investigates the cost-effectiveness of maribavir versus investigator-assigned therapy (IAT) for treatment of post-transplant R/R CMV in the Italian context.

METHODS: The analysis was conducted from the National Health Service (NHS) perspective using a Markov model previously developed in Excel® to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of maribavir versus IAT for the treatment of post-transplant R/R CMV. Health event rates and transition probabilities were informed by data from observational studies and from SOLSTICE clinical trial, which compared maribavir to conventional antiviral treatments for transplant patients with R/R CMV infections. Utilities were from SOLSTICE and a utility vignette study. Costs inputs were derived from published literature and Italian national tariffs for outpatient and hospital services. Costs and outcomes were discounted by 3%.

RESULTS: Maribavir compared to the IAT used for the treatment of post-transplant R/R CMV achieved an incremental cost of € 11,455 for an incremental quality adjusted life year (QALY) gain of 0.313. This resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of € 36,626/QALY, for maribavir compared to IAT, which is below the generally accepted, national willingness-to-pay threshold for orphan drugs (€ 37,000/QALY).

CONCLUSIONS: This analysis showed that maribavir, an orphan drug treatment, is cost-effective compared to the current antiviral treatments used for treatment of post-transplant R/R CMV.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-07

How to Cite

Marcellusi, A., Bini, C., Corinti, S., Fioravanti, L., Dalla Vedova, L., Amorosi, S. L., … Mennini, F. S. (2023). [Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Maribavir in Patients with Post-Transplant Cytomegalovirus Infection or Disease that are Refractory or Resistant to Conventional Therapy]. Farmeconomia. Health Economics and Therapeutic Pathways, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.7175/fe.v24i1.1548

Issue

Section

Original research

Similar Articles

<< < 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Loading...