Economic evaluation of the chronic hepatitis B treatment strategies in Italy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7175/fe.v14i3.665Keywords:
Chronic hepatitis B, Peg-interferon, Markov modelAbstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Pharmacological approaches available in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) are based on 48-weeks finite course of peg-interferon (PEG-IFN) or continuous administration of nucleoside analogues. Recent studies gave way to early identification of non-responders to peg-interferon with a stopping rule based on virologic/serologic markers at week 12. A pharmacoeconomic simulation model was developed to support the economic evaluation of HBeAg-negative CHB treatment strategies, which either involve first line peg-interferon with stopping rule and switch to current most effective analogue entecavir or tenofovir, or nucleosides analogues in first line treatment. This model showed a good cost-effectiveness profile of the first line treatment with peg-interferon. Aim of the present study was the estimation of the impact of a wide adoption of a first line with PEG-IFN and the stopping rule on total overall cost related to CHB over the lifetime of patients in Italy.
METHODS: The Markov model was developed to perform a lifetime simulation of the disease progression considering the following health-related states: active CHB, virologic response, HBsAg clearance, compensated cirrhosis with active CHB, compensated cirrhosis with virologic response, decompensated cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, liver transplant, post-liver transplant and death. The outcomes provided by the model were average survival, quality-adjusted life years (QALY) and costs, calculated from the Italian National Health Service (SSN) perspective. A “current” mix of treatments, where 80% patients received ETV or TDF in first-line, was compared with an “hypothetical” mix defined by a 100% adoption of a PEG-IFN first-line with the stopping rule, to estimate the impact on total lifetime CHB-related costs for a cohort of 100 HBeAg-negative CHB patients in Italy.
RESULTS: Results obtained from the evaluation of overall total treatment cost over patients’ lifetime appeared to confirm the cost-effectiveness of peg-interferon previously assessed. Lifetime overall total cost resulted significantly lower with the “hypothetical” treatment mix as compared to the “current” mix.. In fact, estimated lifetime overall total costs for the former and latter scenario were equal to €7,239,050 and €9,060,150 respectively, thus generating a saving of approximately 20% associated to CHB treatment with first-line peg-interferon.
CONCLUSION: Based on the results obtained from the economic evaluation of the CHB treatment strategies, first-line peg-interferon associated with the stopping rule and switch to nucleoside analogues consistently represents a convenient strategy on both the clinical and economic perspective.
References
European Association For The Study Of The Liver. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of chronic hepatitis B virus infection. J Hepatol 2012; 57: 167-85; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2012.02.010
Veenstra DL, Spackman DE, Bisceglie A, et al. Evaluating anti-viral drug selection and treatment duration in HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2008; 27: 1240-52; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03691.x
Colombo GL, Gaeta GB, Viganò M, et al. A cost-effectiveness analysis of different therapies in patients with chronic hepatitis B in Italy. ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research 2011; 3: 37-46; http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S16655
Arnold E, Yuan Y, Iloeje U, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of entecavir versus lamivudine in the first-line treatment of Australian patients with chronic hepatitis B. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2008; 6: 231-46; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF03256136
Buti M, Brosa M, Casado MA, et al. Modeling the cost-effectiveness of different oral antiviral therapies in patients with chronic hepatitis B. J Hepatol 2009; 51: 640-6; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2009.04.013
Dakin H, Bentley A, Dusheiko G. Cost-utility analysis of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B. Value Health 2010; 13: 922-33; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2010.00782.x
Lui YY, Tsoi KK, Wong VW, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of roadmap models in chronic hepatitis B using tenofovir as the rescue therapy. Antivir Ther 2010; 15: 145-55; http://dx.doi.org/10.3851/IMP1496
Brunetto MR, Moriconi F, Bonino F, et al. Hepatitis B virus surface antigen levels: a guide to sustained response to peginterferon alfa-2a in HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B. Hepatology 2009; 49: 1141-50; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hep.22760
Moucari R, Mackiewicz V, Lada O, et al. Early serum HBsAg drop: a strong predictor of sustained virological response to pegylated interferon alfa-2a in HBeAg-negative patients. Hepatology 2009; 49: 1151-7; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hep.22744
Rijckborst V, Hansen BE, Cakaloglu Y, et al. Early on-treatment prediction of response to peginterferon alfa-2a for HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B using HBsAg and HBV DNA levels. Hepatology 2010; 52: 454–61; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hep.23722
Marcellin P, Piratvisuth T, Brunetto M, et al. On-Treatment Decline in Serum HBsAg Levels Predicts Sustained Immune Control 1 Year Post-Treatment and Subsequent HBsAg Clearance in HBeAg-Negative Hepatitis B Virus-Infected Patients Treated with Peginterferon Alfa-2a [40KD] (PEGASYS). 20th Conference of the Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL). Beijing, 2010
Iannazzo S, Coco B, Brunetto RM, et al. Individualized treatment of HBeAg-negative CHB using peg-interferon alfa-2a as first-line and week 12 HBV-DNAHBsAg stopping rule. A cost-effectiveness analysis. Antivir Ther 2013; http://dx.doi.org/10.3851/IMP2555 [Epub ahead of print]
Marcellin P, Lau GK, Bonino F, et al. Peginterferon alfa-2a alone, lamivudine alone, and the two in combination in patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 1206-17; http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa040431
Lai CL, Shouval D, Lok AS, et al. Entecavir versus lamivudine for patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B. N Engl J Med 2006; 354: 1011-20; http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa051287
Marcellin P, Heathcote EJ, Buti M, et al. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate versus adefovir dipivoxil for chronic hepatitis B. N Engl J Med 2008; 359: 2442-55; http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0802878
Marcellin P, Piratvisuth T, Brunetto M, et al. HBsAg Decline Appears To Predict Clearance- Increasing Rates of HBsAg Clearance and Seroconversion in Patients With HBeAg-Negative Disease Treated With Peginterferon Alfa-2a ± Lamivudine: Results of 5-Year Post-Treatment Follow-up. 44th Annual Meeting of the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL). Copenhagen, 2009
Marcellin P, Chen XY, Curescu M, et al. Early HBsAg decline as a predictor of HBsAg clearance in ‘real life’: results of the S-Collate cohort study in 683 HBeAg-negative patients. 22nd Annual Meeting of the Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL). Taipei, 2012
Lampertico P, Vigano M, Soffredini R, et al. Maintained viral suppression and excellent safety profile of entecavir monotherapy in 418 NUC-naïve patients with chronic hepatitis B : a 4-year field practice, multicenter study. EASL 47th Annual Meeting April 18th-22nd. Barcelona, 2012
Lampertico P, Vigano M, Soffredini R, et al. Tenofovir monotherapy for naive patients with chronic hepatitis B: a multicenter European study in clinical practice in 302 patients followed for 30 months. EASL 47th Annual Meeting April 18th-22nd. Barcelona, 2012
Rijckborst V, Hansen BE, Ferenci P, et al. Validation of a stopping rule at week 12 using HBsAg and HBV DNA for HBeAg-negative patients treated with peginterferon alfa-2a. J Hepatol 2012; 56: 1006-11; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2011.12.007
Fattovich G, Bortolotti F, Donato F. Natural history of chronic hepatitis B: special emphasis on disease progression and prognostic factors. J Hepatol 2008; 48: 335-52; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2007.11.011
Kim WR, Veenstra DL, Iloeje UH, et al. The natural history of chronic hepatitis B infection: a new computer simulation model to incorporate events subsequent to HBeAg seroconversion. Digestive Disease Week. Chicago, 2005
Compendio Farmaceutico Plus. Banca dati del Farmaco e Parafarmaco e dei Dispositivi Medici Ospedalieri. Farmadati Italia
Gazzetta Ufficiale della Repubblica Italiana. G.U. n. 135 del 13/6/2003 (Peg-interferon); G.U. n. 277 del 26/11/2002 (Tenofovir); G.U. n. 28 del 3/2/2007, Gara Regionale Piemonte 2011, 1° bandino (Entecavir).
Gazzetta Ufficiale della Repubblica Italiana. Suppl. N. 161 at G.U. N. 156 del 07/07/2006 e G.U. N. 227 del 29/09/2006
Nomenclatore Tariffario Specialistico. Gazzetta Ufficiale n 216 del 14/09/1996: DM 22/07/1996. Prestazioni di assistenza specialistica ambulatoriale erogabili nell’ambito del Servizio sanitario nazionale e relative tariff
AISF – Associazione Italiana per lo Studio del Fegato. Libro Bianco AISF 2011 – Proposta per un piano nazionale per le malattie epatiche. Disponibile su: www.aisfweb.org (ultimo accesso Giugno 2012)
Levy AR, Kowdley KV, Iloeje U, et al. The impact of chronic hepatitis B on quality of life: a multinational study of utilities from infected and uninfected persons. Value in Health 2008; 11: 527-38; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00297.x
Expert Opinion
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal. The Publication Agreement can be downloaded here, and should be signed by the Authors and sent to the Publisher when the article has been accepted for publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
- Authors are permitted to post their work online after publication (the article must link to publisher version, in html format)
