Research gaps and Health Technology Assessment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7175/fe.v15i2.926Keywords:
Health Technology Assessment, Research gaps, NICEReferences
EUnetHTA, Common questions: What is Health Technology Assessment? Available at: http://www.eunethta.eu/about-us/faq#t287n73 (last accessed April 2014)
Tunis SR, Turkelson C. Using Health Technology Assessment to Identify Gaps in Evidence and Inform Study Design for Comparative Effectiveness Research. J Clin Oncol 2012; 30: 4256-61; http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2012.42.6338
Eddy, D Health Technology Assessment and Evidence-Based Medicine: What Are We Talking About? Value Health 2009; 12 Suppl 2: S6-7; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00551.x
Scott NA, Moga C, Harstall C, et al. Using Health Technology Assessment to Identify Research Gaps: An Unexploited Resource for Increasing the Value of Clinical Research. Healthc Policy 2008; 3: e109-27
NICE. Technology Appraisal Recommendation Categories. Available at: http://www.nice.org.uk/newsroom/nicestatistics/TADecisionsRecommendationCategories.jsp (last accessed April 2014)
Longworth L, Youn J, Bojke L, et al. When Does NICE Recommend the Use of Health Technologies Within a Programme of Evidence Development? A Systematic Review of NICE Guidance. Pharmacoeconomics 2013; 31: 137-49; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-012-0013-6
NICE. Technology appraisal recommendation summary. Available at: http://www.nice.org.uk/newsroom/nicestatistics/TADecisionsRecommendationSummary.jsp (last accessed April 2014)
NICE. Search research recommendations. Available at: http://www.nice.org.uk/research/index.jsp?action=rrsearch (last accessed April 2014)
NICE. Recommendation ID CG 44/3. Available at: http://www.nice.org.uk/research/index.jsp?action=research&o=703 (last accessed April 2014)
NICE. Recommendation ID TA 102/3. Available at: http://www.nice.org.uk/research/index.jsp?action=research&o=1852 (last accessed April 2014)
NICE. Recommendation ID TA 103/1. Available at: http://www.nice.org.uk/research/index.jsp?action=research&o=1896 (last accessed April 2014)
SBU. Scientific Uncertainties – Insufficiently Assessed Health Technologies. December 2012. Available at: http://www.sbu.se/upload/Kunskapsluckor/Scientific_Uncertainties.pdf (last accessed April 2014)
Scott A, Moga C, Harstall C. Using HTA to Identify Research Gaps: A Pilot Study. 2006. HTA Initiative #24. Available at http://www.ihe.ca/documents/HTA%20Initiative24.pdf (last accessed April 2014)
National Institute for Health Research. Identifying research questions. Available at: http://www.nets.nihr.ac.uk/identifying-research (last accessed April 2014)
Claxton K, Palmer S, Longworth L, et al. Informing a decision framework for when NICE should recommend the use of health technologies only in the context of an appropriately designed programme of evidence development. Health Technol Assess 2012; 16: 1-323; http://dx.doi.org/10.3310/hta16460
AHRQ. Series Overview: Closing the Quality Gap: Revisiting the State of Science. Available at: http://www.ahrq.gov/research/findings/evidence-based-reports/er208-overview.html (last accessed April 2014)
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal. The Publication Agreement can be downloaded here, and should be signed by the Authors and sent to the Publisher when the article has been accepted for publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
- Authors are permitted to post their work online after publication (the article must link to publisher version, in html format)
